OSLC4Net_SDK/Tests/OSLC4Net.Core.Tests/ResourceShapeFactoryTests.cs (3)

8-9: Use English for all code comments.

The XML documentation comment is in Chinese. According to Microsoft Framework design guidelines, code comments should be in English for consistency and maintainability.

/// <summary>
-/// 测试ResourceShapeFactory.CreateResourceShape方法
+/// Tests for the ResourceShapeFactory.CreateResourceShape method
/// </summary>

---

91-91: Use English for all code comments.

The inline comment is in Chinese. Keep all comments in English for consistency.

-        // ResourceShapeFactory只处理以Get或Is开头的方法，Requirement类只有从AbstractResourceRecord继承的GetTypes()方法
+        // ResourceShapeFactory only processes methods starting with Get or Is, Requirement class only has GetTypes() method inherited from AbstractResourceRecord

---

10-15: Consider using more descriptive constant names.

The constants could be more descriptive to better reflect their purpose in the OSLC context.

-    private const string BaseUri = "http://example.com";
-    private const string ResourceShapesPath = "resourceShapes";
-    private const string ResourceShapePath = "requirement";
+    private const string TestBaseUri = "http://example.com";
+    private const string OslcResourceShapesPath = "resourceShapes";
+    private const string RequirementResourceShapePath = "requirement";

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

OSLC4Net_SDK/Tests/OSLC4Net.Core.Tests/ResourceShapeFactoryTests.cs (6)

1-5: Organize imports according to C# conventions.

The using directives should be organized with System namespaces first, followed by third-party libraries, then project namespaces. Additionally, there's a missing using System.Linq; import that's required for LINQ operations used throughout the file.

+using System;
+using System.Linq;
 using OSLC4Net.Core.Model;
 using OSLC4Net.Core.Attribute;
 using OSLC4Net.Domains.RequirementsManagement;
 using Xunit;

---

14-31: Simplify test to focus on single responsibility.

This test validates multiple aspects of the resource shape (non-null checks and URI construction). Consider splitting into focused tests or removing redundant assertions since the URI construction is already validated separately.

 [Fact]
-public void CreateResourceShape_WithRequirementType_ShouldReturnValidResourceShape()
+public void CreateResourceShape_WithRequirementType_ShouldReturnNonNullResourceShape()
 {
     // Arrange
     var resourceType = typeof(Requirement);

     // Act
     var resourceShape = ResourceShapeFactory.CreateResourceShape(
         BaseUri,
         ResourceShapesPath,
         ResourceShapePath,
         resourceType);

     // Assert
     Assert.NotNull(resourceShape);
-    Assert.NotNull(resourceShape.GetAbout());
-    Assert.Equal($"{BaseUri}/{ResourceShapesPath}/{ResourceShapePath}", resourceShape.GetAbout().ToString());
 }

---

133-135: Test assertion may be too brittle.

Using Assert.Single(properties) assumes exactly one property will always be present. This could break if the Requirement class gains additional OSLC properties. Consider using a more specific assertion.

-Assert.Single(properties);
-Assert.Equal("type", properties[0].GetName());
+var typeProperties = properties.Where(p => p.GetName() == "type").ToList();
+Assert.Single(typeProperties);
+Assert.Equal("type", typeProperties[0].GetName());

---

298-332: Clean up commented code or document test intent.

This test contains extensive commented-out assertions which makes it unclear whether this is work-in-progress or intentionally demonstrates unsupported functionality. The comment on Line 298-299 suggests this is intentional, but the commented code should either be removed or properly documented.

 // Note: ResourceShapeFactory only supports getter/setter methods, not direct properties
-// Direct property pattern is not supported by ResourceShapeFactory
+// This test verifies that direct property patterns are NOT supported by ResourceShapeFactory
 [Fact]
-public void CreateResourceShape_WithISetUriProperty_ShouldMapToResourceValueType()
+public void CreateResourceShape_WithISetUriDirectProperty_ShouldNotMapProperty()
 {
     // Arrange
     var resourceType = typeof(TestResourceWithISetUri);

     // Act
     var resourceShape = ResourceShapeFactory.CreateResourceShape(
         BaseUri,
         ResourceShapesPath,
         ResourceShapePath,
         resourceType);

     // Assert
+    // Direct properties are not supported - only getter/setter method patterns
     var properties = resourceShape.GetProperties();
     var uriSetProperty = properties.FirstOrDefault(p => p.GetName() == "uriSet");

     Assert.Null(uriSetProperty);
-    //Assert.Equal("uriSet", uriSetProperty.GetName());
-
-    //var actualValueType = uriSetProperty.GetValueType();
-    //var actualOccurs = uriSetProperty.GetOccurs();
-
-    //Assert.NotNull(actualValueType);
-    //Assert.NotNull(actualOccurs);
-
-    //var expectedValueTypeUri = new Uri(ValueTypeExtension.ToString(OSLC4Net.Core.Model.ValueType.Resource));
-    //var expectedOccursUri = new Uri(OccursExtension.ToString(OSLC4Net.Core.Model.Occurs.ZeroOrMany));
-
-    //Assert.Equal(expectedValueTypeUri, actualValueType);
-    //Assert.Equal(expectedOccursUri, actualOccurs);
-    //Assert.Equal("http://example.com/uriSet", uriSetProperty.GetPropertyDefinition()?.ToString());
 }

---

392-392: Remove unnecessary 'this' qualifier.

The this qualifier is redundant when there's no naming conflict.

-this._uriCollection = uriCollection;
+_uriCollection = uriCollection;

---

421-421: Use more readable array initialization.

The current initialization new Uri[0] can be replaced with the more readable Array.Empty<Uri>() for better intent clarity.

-private Uri[] _uriArray = new Uri[0];
+private Uri[] _uriArray = Array.Empty<Uri>();

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

• MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.